Among good people, gratitude rarely comes from weakness. It comes from strength. From breadth. From the capacity to understand, forgive, integrate, and survive.<\/p>\n
And that is precisely why it is dangerous. For such people, gratitude becomes:<\/p>\n
- \n
- a sedative for conscience<\/li>\n
- an anesthetic for anger<\/li>\n
- a substitute for boundaries<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
And this is especially dangerous because it comes from good people.<\/p>\n
Bad people do not misuse gratitude. They simply ignore it. Gratitude is misused by good people\u2014and that is how a larger systemic problem is created.<\/p>\n
A bad person causes damage locally.
\nA good person who does not react legitimizes the damage.<\/p>\nGratitude that comes too early kills diagnosis<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The contemporary narrative around gratitude does not come from nowhere. It comes from highly respectable sources. Thinkers I deeply respect\u2014such as Martin Seligman<\/strong>, Robert Emmons<\/strong>, and Sonja Lyubomirsky<\/strong>\u2014as well as institutions and platforms like Harvard Health<\/em>, the American Psychological Association<\/em>, and the Journal of Positive Psychology<\/em>, are full of research, articles, and recommendations about the power of gratitude.<\/p>\n
And these brilliant people are not wrong.<\/p>\n
Gratitude does reduce stress, increase a sense of meaning, strengthen resilience, and help us cope with difficult circumstances. This is empirically proven, important, and effective.<\/p>\n
But it is not the whole truth.<\/p>\n
Because in the popular interpretation of these powerful ideas, we rarely ask questions about action, boundaries, and power. Gratitude is almost exclusively treated as an intrapsychic tool\u2014a way for the individual to feel better within given (often unfavorable) circumstances.<\/p>\n
What is systematically missing is the question: Are those circumstances unjust, harmful, or changeable\u2014and what is our responsibility toward them?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n
That is where the problem begins. The problem lies in what is omitted. In what is not deepened.<\/p>\n
Today, gratitude is widely promoted and applied before<\/em> reaction, rather than after<\/em> it. And gratitude that comes too early kills diagnosis. If we do not see harm as harm, we dull the very edge of change that is required.<\/p>\n
Without diagnosis, there is no intervention.
\nWithout intervention, harm becomes normalized.<\/p>\nThe septic tank of modern life<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Imagine living in a septic tank\u2014but wearing a protective suit.<\/p>\n
The suit has air filters, so it smells less. It has a visor, so the waste starts to resemble beautiful shapes\u2014like clouds in the sky. It becomes tolerable. Over time, even comfortable.<\/p>\n
But the septic tank remains what it is.
\nAnd, most importantly, it continues to fill.<\/p>\nGratitude, in its popularized (and populist) form, does not drain the tank. It merely allows us to stay inside it longer\u2014and survive. At that point, gratitude stops being a virtue. It becomes a tool of harm.<\/p>\n
Not good for us\u2014and certainly not good for the world around us.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/draganadjermanovic.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/vaza-1024x932.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\u201cGrateful for harm\u201d and \u201cungrateful for good\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n
This is the symmetry of the pathology.<\/p>\n
On one side are people who are grateful<\/strong> for harm<\/em>. They call injustice a lesson. Bad relationships growth. Systemic stupidity an \u201copportunity.\u201d<\/p>\n
On the other side are people who are ungrateful<\/strong> for good<\/em>, because they experience it as something they are entitled to. As a standard. As a reward.<\/p>\n
One side erases the bad.
\nThe other erases the good.<\/p>\nBoth erase reality.<\/p>\n
That is why gratitude is not a moral virtue in itself. Just as ingratitude is not always a flaw. Both are tools. And every tool must be properly directed.<\/p>\n
Misused tools cause damage\u2014and unfortunately, we misuse most of them.<\/p>\n
I am not obliged to be grateful. I am obliged not<\/em> to be.<\/strong><\/h2>\n
This needs to be said clearly\u2014and loudly.<\/p>\n